Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i7-12700F-vs-Intel-Core-i3-10300T

Intel Core i7-12700F vs Intel Core i3-10300T

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i7-12700F and Intel Core i3-10300T

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i3-10300T has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to Intel Core i7-12700F's GHz. Intel Core i3-10300T has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Core i7-12700F's GHz. Intel Core i7-12700F has more cores (12) compared to Intel Core i3-10300T's 4 cores. Intel Core i3-10300T supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Core i7-12700F's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i7-12700F uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while Intel Core i3-10300T uses the FCLGA1200 socket. Intel Core i7-12700F was launched in Q1 2022, while Intel Core i3-10300T was launched in Q3 2020. Intel Core i7-12700F has a larger L3 cache of 25 MB compared to Intel Core i3-10300T's 8 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i7-12700F and Intel Core i3-10300T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i7-12700F has a base speed of GHz, while the Intel Core i3-10300T runs at 3.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i7-12700F supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.9 GHz for the Intel Core i3-10300T.
Cores: The Intel Core i7-12700F has 12 cores, while the Intel Core i3-10300T has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i7-12700F supports threads, compared to 8 threads for the Intel Core i3-10300T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i7-12700F uses the FCLGA1700, while the Intel Core i3-10300T uses the FCLGA1200.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i7-12700F was launched on Q1 2022, while the Intel Core i3-10300T was released on Q3 2020.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i7-12700F has 25 MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the Intel Core i3-10300T.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i7-12700F	Intel Core i3-10300T

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	GHz	3.0 GHz
Turbo	GHz	3.9 GHz
Cores	12	4
Threads		8
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA1700	FCLGA1200
Launched	Q1 2022	Q3 2020
L3 Cache	25 MB	8 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i7-12700F:

64%

Intel Core i3-10300T:

38%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i7-12700F

44%

Intel Core i3-10300T:

11%

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i7-12700F: 65 watts

16.25%

Intel Core i3-10300T: 35 watts

8.75%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i7-12700F : Q1 2022 ✅

Intel Core i3-10300T : Q3 2020 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i7-12700F

Intel Core i3-10300T

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i7-12700F – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3869, the Intel Core i7-12700F outperforms the Intel Core i3-10300T (score: 2302). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i7-12700F features a larger L3 cache of 25MB compared to the Intel Core i3-10300T's 8MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i7-12700F has a higher CPU Mark score of 129.95 compared to the Intel Core i3-10300T's 80.15. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i7-12700F has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10300T's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i7-12700F has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-10300T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Core i3-10300T – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-10300T was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the Intel Core i7-12700F (Q1 2022). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-10300T has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core i7-12700F's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i3-10300T supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Core i7-12700F's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-10300T has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i7-12700F's 12 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-10300T scores 7935, which is lower than the Intel Core i7-12700F's score of 30667. This makes the Intel Core i7-12700F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

Intel Core i7-12700F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Core i3-10300T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i7-12700F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.

Intel Core i3-10300T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict