Comparison between Intel Core i9-10900F and AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Intel Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Core i9-10900F's 2.8 GHz.
Intel Core i9-10900F has a higher turbo speed of 5.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 3.9 GHz.
Intel Core i9-10900F has more cores (10) compared to AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 4 cores.
Intel Core i9-10900F supports more threads (20) compared to AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i9-10900F uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket.
Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q3 2020.
Intel Core i9-10900F has a larger L3 cache of 20 MB compared to AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i9-10900F and AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-10900F has a base speed of 2.8 GHz, while the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-10900F supports a turbo speed of 5.2 GHz, compared to 3.9 GHz for the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-10900F has 10 cores, while the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-10900F supports 20 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-10900F uses the FCLGA1200, while the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-10900F was launched on Q3 2020, while the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was released on Q3 2020.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10900F has 20 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i9-10900F
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
5.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Cores
10
4
Threads
20
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1200
AM4
Launched
Q3 2020
Q3 2020
L3 Cache
20 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-10900F:
50%
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G:
38%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-10900F
28%
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G:
11%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i9-10900F: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i9-10900F : Q3 2020 ✅
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G : Q3 2020 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i9-10900F
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i9-10900F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i9-10900F supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 3.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3030, the Intel Core i9-10900F outperforms the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G (score: 2321). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10900F features a larger L3 cache of 20MB compared to the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Core i9-10900F's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i9-10900F's 46.90. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10900F's 10 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has 4 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10900F's 20 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7702, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-10900F's score of 19891. This makes the Intel Core i9-10900F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i9-10900F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i9-10900F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i9-10900F
The Intel Core i9-10900F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
