Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i9-10900K-vs-Intel-Core-i3-3250T

Intel Core i9-10900K vs Intel Core i3-3250T

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i9-10900K and Intel Core i3-3250T

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i9-10900K has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 3.0 GHz. Intel Core i9-10900K has a higher turbo speed of 5.3 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's GHz. Intel Core i9-10900K has more cores (10) compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 2 cores. Intel Core i9-10900K supports more threads (20) compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 4 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i9-10900K uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while Intel Core i3-3250T uses the FCLGA1155 socket. Intel Core i9-10900K was launched in Q2 2020, while Intel Core i3-3250T was launched in Q1 2016. Intel Core i9-10900K has a larger L3 cache of 20 MB compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 3 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i9-10900K and Intel Core i3-3250T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-10900K has a base speed of 3.7 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-3250T runs at 3.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-10900K supports a turbo speed of 5.3 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-10900K has 10 cores, while the Intel Core i3-3250T has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-10900K supports 20 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-10900K uses the FCLGA1200, while the Intel Core i3-3250T uses the FCLGA1155.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-10900K was launched on Q2 2020, while the Intel Core i3-3250T was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10900K has 20 MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-3250T.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i9-10900K	Intel Core i3-3250T

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	3.7 GHz	3.0 GHz
Turbo	5.3 GHz	GHz
Cores	10	2
Threads	20	4
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA1200	FCLGA1155
Launched	Q2 2020	Q1 2016
L3 Cache	20 MB	3 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i9-10900K:

52%

Intel Core i3-3250T:

28%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i9-10900K

32%

Intel Core i3-3250T:

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i9-10900K: 125 watts

31.25%

Intel Core i3-3250T: 35 watts

8.75%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i9-10900K : Q2 2020 ✅

Intel Core i3-3250T : Q1 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i9-10900K

Intel Core i3-3250T

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i9-10900K – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i9-10900K was launched more recently (Q2 2020) compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i9-10900K has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's 3.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i9-10900K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.3 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3127, the Intel Core i9-10900K outperforms the Intel Core i3-3250T (score: 1684). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10900K features a larger L3 cache of 20MB compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's 3MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i9-10900K has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Core i3-3250T – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-3250T has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i9-10900K's 46.86. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-3250T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10900K's 10 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-3250T has 4 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10900K's 20 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-3250T scores 2650, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-10900K's score of 22726. This makes the Intel Core i9-10900K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

Intel Core i9-10900K
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Core i3-3250T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i9-10900K
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.

Intel Core i3-3250T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict