Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i9-10910-vs-Intel-Celeron-1047UE

Intel Core i9-10910 vs Intel Celeron 1047UE

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i9-10910 and Intel Celeron 1047UE

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i9-10910 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron 1047UE's 1.4 GHz. Intel Core i9-10910 has a higher turbo speed of 5.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron 1047UE's GHz. Intel Core i9-10910 has more cores (10) compared to Intel Celeron 1047UE's 2 cores. Intel Core i9-10910 supports more threads (20) compared to Intel Celeron 1047UE's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i9-10910 uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while Intel Celeron 1047UE uses the FCBGA1023 socket. Intel Core i9-10910 was launched in Q3 2020, while Intel Celeron 1047UE was launched in Q1 2014. Intel Core i9-10910 has a larger L3 cache of 20 MB compared to Intel Celeron 1047UE's 2 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i9-10910 and Intel Celeron 1047UE are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-10910 has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE runs at 1.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-10910 supports a turbo speed of 5.0 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron 1047UE.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-10910 has 10 cores, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-10910 supports 20 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron 1047UE.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-10910 uses the FCLGA1200, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE uses the FCBGA1023.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-10910 was launched on Q3 2020, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10910 has 20 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron 1047UE.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i9-10910	Intel Celeron 1047UE

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	3.6 GHz	1.4 GHz
Turbo	5.0 GHz	GHz
Cores	10	2
Threads	20	2
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA1200	FCBGA1023
Launched	Q3 2020	Q1 2014
L3 Cache	20 MB	2 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i9-10910:

52%

Intel Celeron 1047UE:

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i9-10910

31%

Intel Celeron 1047UE:

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i9-10910: 125 watts

31.25%

Intel Celeron 1047UE: 17 watts

4.25%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i9-10910 : Q3 2020 ✅

Intel Celeron 1047UE : Q1 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i9-10910

Intel Celeron 1047UE

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i9-10910 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i9-10910 was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i9-10910 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE's 1.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i9-10910 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3162, the Intel Core i9-10910 outperforms the Intel Celeron 1047UE (score: 526). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10910 features a larger L3 cache of 20MB compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i9-10910 has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE's 17W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Celeron 1047UE – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Not available

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron 1047UE has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10910's 10 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron 1047UE has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10910's 20 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron 1047UE scores 748, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-10910's score of 21437. This makes the Intel Core i9-10910 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

Intel Core i9-10910
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron 1047UE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i9-10910
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.

Intel Celeron 1047UE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict