Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i9-10910-vs-Intel-Celeron-J4105

Intel Core i9-10910 vs Intel Celeron J4105

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i9-10910 and Intel Celeron J4105

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i9-10910 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4105's 1.5 GHz. Intel Core i9-10910 has a higher turbo speed of 5.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4105's 2.5 GHz. Intel Core i9-10910 has more cores (10) compared to Intel Celeron J4105's 4 cores. Intel Core i9-10910 supports more threads (20) compared to Intel Celeron J4105's 4 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i9-10910 uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while Intel Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket. Intel Core i9-10910 was launched in Q3 2020, while Intel Celeron J4105 was launched in Q1 2018. Intel Core i9-10910 has a larger L3 cache of 20 MB compared to Intel Celeron J4105's MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i9-10910 and Intel Celeron J4105 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-10910 has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J4105 runs at 1.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-10910 supports a turbo speed of 5.0 GHz, compared to 2.5 GHz for the Intel Celeron J4105.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-10910 has 10 cores, while the Intel Celeron J4105 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-10910 supports 20 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Celeron J4105.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-10910 uses the FCLGA1200, while the Intel Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-10910 was launched on Q3 2020, while the Intel Celeron J4105 was released on Q1 2018.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10910 has 20 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J4105.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i9-10910	Intel Celeron J4105

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	3.6 GHz	1.5 GHz
Turbo	5.0 GHz	2.5 GHz
Cores	10	4
Threads	20	4
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA1200	FCBGA1090
Launched	Q3 2020	Q1 2018
L3 Cache	20 MB	MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i9-10910:

52%

Intel Celeron J4105:

18%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i9-10910

31%

Intel Celeron J4105:

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i9-10910: 125 watts

31.25%

Intel Celeron J4105: 10 watts

2.5%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i9-10910 : Q3 2020 ✅

Intel Celeron J4105 : Q1 2018 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i9-10910

Intel Celeron J4105

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i9-10910 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i9-10910 was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the Intel Celeron J4105 (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i9-10910 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i9-10910 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 2.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3162, the Intel Core i9-10910 outperforms the Intel Celeron J4105 (score: 1091). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10910 features a larger L3 cache of 20MB compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i9-10910 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 27.10. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i9-10910 has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Celeron J4105 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Not available

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J4105 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10910's 10 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J4105 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10910's 20 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4105 scores 2900, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-10910's score of 21437. This makes the Intel Core i9-10910 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

Intel Core i9-10910
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron J4105
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i9-10910
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.

Intel Celeron J4105
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict