Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i9-9920X-vs-Intel-Core-i3-7320

Intel Core i9-9920X vs Intel Core i3-7320

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i9-9920X and Intel Core i3-7320

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i3-7320 has a higher base speed of 4.1 GHz compared to Intel Core i9-9920X's 3.5 GHz. Intel Core i9-9920X has a higher turbo speed of 4.5 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-7320's GHz. Intel Core i9-9920X has more cores (12) compared to Intel Core i3-7320's 2 cores. Intel Core i9-9920X supports more threads (24) compared to Intel Core i3-7320's 4 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i9-9920X uses the FCLGA2066 socket, while Intel Core i3-7320 uses the FCLGA1151 socket. Intel Core i9-9920X was launched in Q4 2018, while Intel Core i3-7320 was launched in Q1 2017. Intel Core i9-9920X has a larger L3 cache of 19 MB compared to Intel Core i3-7320's 4 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i9-9920X and Intel Core i3-7320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-9920X has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-7320 runs at 4.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-9920X supports a turbo speed of 4.5 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-7320.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-9920X has 12 cores, while the Intel Core i3-7320 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-9920X supports 24 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-7320.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-9920X uses the FCLGA2066, while the Intel Core i3-7320 uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-9920X was launched on Q4 2018, while the Intel Core i3-7320 was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-9920X has 19 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Core i3-7320.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i9-9920X	Intel Core i3-7320

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	3.5 GHz	4.1 GHz
Turbo	4.5 GHz	GHz
Cores	12	2
Threads	24	4
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA2066	FCLGA1151
Launched	Q4 2018	Q1 2017
L3 Cache	19 MB	4 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i9-9920X:

43%

Intel Core i3-7320:

41%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i9-9920X

36%

Intel Core i3-7320:

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i9-9920X: 165 watts

41.25%

Intel Core i3-7320: 51 watts

12.75%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i9-9920X : Q4 2018 ✅

Intel Core i3-7320 : Q1 2017 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i9-9920X

Intel Core i3-7320

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i9-9920X – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i9-9920X was launched more recently (Q4 2018) compared to the Intel Core i3-7320 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i9-9920X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.5 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-7320's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2639, the Intel Core i9-9920X outperforms the Intel Core i3-7320 (score: 2508). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-9920X features a larger L3 cache of 19MB compared to the Intel Core i3-7320's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i9-9920X has a higher CPU Mark score of 83.84 compared to the Intel Core i3-7320's 45.24. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i9-9920X has a higher TDP of 165W compared to the Intel Core i3-7320's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Core i3-7320 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-7320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the Intel Core i9-9920X's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-7320 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-9920X's 12 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-7320 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-9920X's 24 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-7320 scores 4840, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-9920X's score of 25163. This makes the Intel Core i9-9920X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

Intel Core i9-9920X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Core i3-7320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i9-9920X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.

Intel Core i3-7320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict