🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » Intel-Core2-Extreme-Q9200-vs-AMD-Ryzen-Threadripper-1950X

Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher base speed of 3.4 GHz compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 2.4 GHz. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's GHz. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more cores (16) compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 4 cores. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports more threads (32) compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 4 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 uses the socket, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses the sTR4 socket. Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X was launched in Q3 2017. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has a base speed of 2.4 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X runs at 3.4 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
  • Cores: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 4 cores, while the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 16 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 supports 4 threads, compared to 32 threads for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 uses the , while the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses the sTR4.
  • Launch Date: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X was released on Q3 2017.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 32 MB for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Intel AMD
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Speed 2.4 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo GHz 4.0 GHz
Cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket sTR4
Launched Q4 2019 Q3 2017
L3 Cache MB 32 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200:



18%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X:
37%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200



2%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X:
40%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200: watts



0%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: 180 watts
45%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 : Q4 2019 ✅

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X : Q3 2017 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200



AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X


Pro's and Con's

Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (Q3 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 44.51. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 16 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 32 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 scores 2011, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's score of 27684. This makes the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher base clock speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 2.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2275, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 (score: 1080). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher TDP of 180W compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200

The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.