Comparison between Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Core i3-7350K
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-7350K has a higher base speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 2.4 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i3-7350K's 2 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 uses the socket, while Intel Core i3-7350K uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched in Q4 2019, while Intel Core i3-7350K was launched in Q1 2017.
Intel Core i3-7350K has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Core i3-7350K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has a base speed of 2.4 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-7350K runs at 4.2 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-7350K.
Cores: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i3-7350K has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-7350K.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 uses the , while the Intel Core i3-7350K uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched on Q4 2019, while the Intel Core i3-7350K was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Core i3-7350K.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Intel Core i3-7350K
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
2.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q4 2019
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200:
18%
Intel Core i3-7350K:
42%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
2%
Intel Core i3-7350K:
7%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200: watts
0%
Intel Core i3-7350K: 60 watts
15%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 : Q4 2019 ✅
Intel Core i3-7350K : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Intel Core i3-7350K
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the Intel Core i3-7350K (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i3-7350K's 118.26. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 scores 2011, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-7350K's score of 4967. This makes the Intel Core i3-7350K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Intel Core i3-7350K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-7350K has a higher base clock speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 2.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2576, the Intel Core i3-7350K outperforms the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 (score: 1080). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-7350K features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-7350K has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-7350K has a higher TDP of 60W compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-7350K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-7350K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-7350K
The Intel Core i3-7350K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
