Comparison between Intel Xeon W-3175X and AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Intel Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900 is manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.1 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 has a higher turbo speed of 4.3 GHz compared to Intel Xeon W-3175X's 3.8 GHz.
Intel Xeon W-3175X has more cores (28) compared to AMD Ryzen 9 3900's 12 cores.
Intel Xeon W-3175X supports more threads (56) compared to AMD Ryzen 9 3900's 24 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Xeon W-3175X uses the FCLGA3647 socket, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900 uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Xeon W-3175X was launched in Q1 2019, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900 was launched in Q4 2019.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 has a larger L3 cache of 64 MB compared to Intel Xeon W-3175X's 39 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Xeon W-3175X and AMD Ryzen 9 3900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Xeon W-3175X has a base speed of 3.1 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 runs at 3.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Xeon W-3175X supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to 4.3 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 9 3900.
Cores: The Intel Xeon W-3175X has 28 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 has 12 cores.
Threads: The Intel Xeon W-3175X supports 56 threads, compared to 24 threads for the AMD Ryzen 9 3900.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Xeon W-3175X uses the FCLGA3647, while the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Xeon W-3175X was launched on Q1 2019, while the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 was released on Q4 2019.
L3 Cache: The Intel Xeon W-3175X has 39 MB of L3 cache, compared to 64 MB for the AMD Ryzen 9 3900.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Xeon W-3175X
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Cores
28
12
Threads
56
24
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA3647
AM4
Launched
Q1 2019
Q4 2019
L3 Cache
39 MB
64 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Xeon W-3175X:
39%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900:
43%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Xeon W-3175X
62%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900:
44%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Xeon W-3175X: 255 watts
63.75%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Xeon W-3175X : Q1 2019 ✅
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 : Q4 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Xeon W-3175X
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Pro's and Con's
Intel Xeon W-3175X – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Xeon W-3175X has a higher TDP of 255W compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 3900's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the Intel Xeon W-3175X (Q1 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz compared to the Intel Xeon W-3175X's 3.8 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2617, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms the Intel Xeon W-3175X (score: 2374). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 features a larger L3 cache of 64MB compared to the Intel Xeon W-3175X's 39MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 has a higher CPU Mark score of 60.95 compared to the Intel Xeon W-3175X's 14.12. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 has 12 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Xeon W-3175X's 28 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 has 24 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Xeon W-3175X's 56 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 30723, which is lower than the Intel Xeon W-3175X's score of 42900. This makes the Intel Xeon W-3175X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Xeon W-3175X
This cpu Handles High End level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for High End level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
This cpu Handles High End level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for High End level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Xeon W-3175X
Ideal for High End level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and High End level computing.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Ideal for High End level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and High End level computing.
Verdict
Intel Xeon W-3175X
The Intel Xeon W-3175X is a reliable and High End processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with High End computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 is a reliable and High End processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with High End computing needs or those building a New PC.