Comparison between AMD 4700S and AMD PRO A10-8770E
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD 4700S has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's 2.8 GHz.
AMD 4700S has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's 3.5 GHz.
AMD 4700S has more cores (8) compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's 4 cores.
AMD 4700S supports more threads (16) compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD 4700S uses the socket, while AMD PRO A10-8770E uses the AM4 socket.
AMD 4700S was launched in Q2 2021, while AMD PRO A10-8770E was launched in Q1 2017.
AMD 4700S has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD 4700S and AMD PRO A10-8770E are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD 4700S has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD PRO A10-8770E runs at 2.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD 4700S supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to 3.5 GHz for the AMD PRO A10-8770E.
Cores: The AMD 4700S has 8 cores, while the AMD PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD 4700S supports 16 threads, compared to threads for the AMD PRO A10-8770E.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD 4700S uses the , while the AMD PRO A10-8770E uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD 4700S was launched on Q2 2021, while the AMD PRO A10-8770E was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD 4700S has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD PRO A10-8770E.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD 4700S
AMD PRO A10-8770E
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Turbo
4.0 GHz
3.5 GHz
Cores
8
4
Threads
16
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
Launched
Q2 2021
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
8 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD 4700S:
39%
AMD PRO A10-8770E:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD 4700S
25%
AMD PRO A10-8770E:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD 4700S: watts
0%
AMD PRO A10-8770E: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD 4700S : Q2 2021 ✅
AMD PRO A10-8770E : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD 4700S
AMD PRO A10-8770E
Pro's and Con's
AMD 4700S – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD 4700S was launched more recently (Q2 2021) compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD 4700S has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD 4700S supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 3.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2362, the AMD 4700S outperforms the AMD PRO A10-8770E (score: 1450). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD 4700S features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD PRO A10-8770E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD 4700S's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has threads, which is fewer than the AMD 4700S's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD PRO A10-8770E scores 3037, which is lower than the AMD 4700S's score of 17865. This makes the AMD 4700S a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the AMD 4700S's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD 4700S
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD PRO A10-8770E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD 4700S
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD PRO A10-8770E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD 4700S
The AMD 4700S is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD PRO A10-8770E
The AMD PRO A10-8770E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
