Comparison between AMD A10-6700T APU and Intel Celeron J1900
AMD A10-6700T APU is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J1900 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD A10-6700T APU has a higher base speed of 2.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J1900's 2.0 GHz.
AMD A10-6700T APU has a higher turbo speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J1900's 2.4 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Intel Celeron J1900 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD A10-6700T APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD A10-6700T APU uses the FM2 socket, while Intel Celeron J1900 uses the FCBGA1170 socket.
AMD A10-6700T APU was launched in Q2 2014, while Intel Celeron J1900 was launched in Q1 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD A10-6700T APU and Intel Celeron J1900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD A10-6700T APU has a base speed of 2.5 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J1900 runs at 2.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD A10-6700T APU supports a turbo speed of 3.5 GHz, compared to 2.4 GHz for the Intel Celeron J1900.
Cores: The AMD A10-6700T APU has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron J1900 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD A10-6700T APU supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Celeron J1900.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD A10-6700T APU uses the FM2, while the Intel Celeron J1900 uses the FCBGA1170.
Launch Date: The AMD A10-6700T APU was launched on Q2 2014, while the Intel Celeron J1900 was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD A10-6700T APU has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J1900.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD A10-6700T APU
Intel Celeron J1900
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
2.5 GHz
2.0 GHz
Turbo
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2
FCBGA1170
Launched
Q2 2014
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD A10-6700T APU:
21%
Intel Celeron J1900:
10%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD A10-6700T APU
3%
Intel Celeron J1900:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD A10-6700T APU: 45 watts
11.25%
Intel Celeron J1900: 10 watts
2.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD A10-6700T APU : Q2 2014 ✅
Intel Celeron J1900 : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD A10-6700T APU
Intel Celeron J1900
Pro's and Con's
AMD A10-6700T APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A10-6700T APU was launched more recently (Q2 2014) compared to the Intel Celeron J1900 (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A10-6700T APU has a higher base clock speed of 2.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J1900's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A10-6700T APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J1900's 2.4 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1290, the AMD A10-6700T APU outperforms the Intel Celeron J1900 (score: 651). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-6700T APU has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J1900's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A10-6700T APU has a higher TDP of 45W compared to the Intel Celeron J1900's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron J1900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J1900 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD A10-6700T APU's 26.12. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J1900 scores 1149, which is lower than the AMD A10-6700T APU's score of 2299. This makes the AMD A10-6700T APU a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD A10-6700T APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J1900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD A10-6700T APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J1900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD A10-6700T APU
The AMD A10-6700T APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J1900
The Intel Celeron J1900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.