Comparison between AMD A10-9700 and AMD Athlon II X4 655
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD A10-9700 has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's 3.3 GHz.
AMD A10-9700 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Athlon II X4 655 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD A10-9700's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD A10-9700 uses the AM4 socket, while AMD Athlon II X4 655 uses the AM2+ socket.
AMD A10-9700 was launched in Q4 2016, while AMD Athlon II X4 655 was launched in Q1 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD A10-9700 and AMD Athlon II X4 655 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD A10-9700 has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 runs at 3.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD A10-9700 supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
Cores: The AMD A10-9700 has 4 cores, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD A10-9700 supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD A10-9700 uses the AM4, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 uses the AM2+.
Launch Date: The AMD A10-9700 was launched on Q4 2016, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD A10-9700 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD A10-9700
AMD Athlon II X4 655
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM2+
Launched
Q4 2016
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD A10-9700:
26%
AMD Athlon II X4 655:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD A10-9700
5%
AMD Athlon II X4 655:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD A10-9700: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Athlon II X4 655: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD A10-9700 : Q4 2016 ✅
AMD Athlon II X4 655 : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD A10-9700
AMD Athlon II X4 655
Pro's and Con's
AMD A10-9700 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A10-9700 was launched more recently (Q4 2016) compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655 (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A10-9700 has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655's 3.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A10-9700 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1615, the AMD A10-9700 outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 655 (score: 1473). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-9700 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 655's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
AMD Athlon II X4 655 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon II X4 655 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD A10-9700's 118.29. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon II X4 655 scores 2078, which is lower than the AMD A10-9700's score of 3547. This makes the AMD A10-9700 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon II X4 655 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD A10-9700's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD A10-9700
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon II X4 655
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD A10-9700
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon II X4 655
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD A10-9700
The AMD A10-9700 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon II X4 655
The AMD Athlon II X4 655 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
