Comparison between AMD A10-9700E and Intel Celeron G3920
AMD A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD A10-9700E has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3920's 2.9 GHz.
AMD A10-9700E has a higher turbo speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3920's GHz.
AMD A10-9700E has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3920's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G3920 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD A10-9700E's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD A10-9700E uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron G3920 uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
AMD A10-9700E was launched in Q4 2017, while Intel Celeron G3920 was launched in Q2 2016.
Intel Celeron G3920 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD A10-9700E's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD A10-9700E and Intel Celeron G3920 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD A10-9700E has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3920 runs at 2.9 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD A10-9700E supports a turbo speed of 3.5 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3920.
Cores: The AMD A10-9700E has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3920 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD A10-9700E supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3920.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD A10-9700E uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron G3920 uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The AMD A10-9700E was launched on Q4 2017, while the Intel Celeron G3920 was released on Q2 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD A10-9700E has MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3920.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD A10-9700E
Intel Celeron G3920
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.0 GHz
2.9 GHz
Turbo
3.5 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q4 2017
Q2 2016
L3 Cache
MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD A10-9700E:
25%
Intel Celeron G3920:
29%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD A10-9700E
4%
Intel Celeron G3920:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD A10-9700E: 35 watts
8.75%
Intel Celeron G3920: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD A10-9700E : Q4 2017 ✅
Intel Celeron G3920 : Q2 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD A10-9700E
Intel Celeron G3920
Pro's and Con's
AMD A10-9700E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A10-9700E was launched more recently (Q4 2017) compared to the Intel Celeron G3920 (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A10-9700E has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's 2.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A10-9700E supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A10-9700E has a higher CPU Mark score of 36.39 compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's 2.18. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-9700E has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G3920's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Intel Celeron G3920 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1781, the Intel Celeron G3920 outperforms the AMD A10-9700E (score: 1505). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3920 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD A10-9700E's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3920 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A10-9700E's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3920 scores 2358, which is lower than the AMD A10-9700E's score of 3242. This makes the AMD A10-9700E a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G3920 has a higher TDP of 51W compared to the AMD A10-9700E's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD A10-9700E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G3920
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD A10-9700E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G3920
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD A10-9700E
The AMD A10-9700E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G3920
The Intel Celeron G3920 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
