🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-A6-9230-vs-Intel-Celeron-G1620T

AMD A6-9230 vs Intel Celeron G1620T

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD A6-9230 and Intel Celeron G1620T

AMD A6-9230 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G1620T is manufactured by Intel. AMD A6-9230 has a higher base speed of 2.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G1620T's 2.4 GHz. AMD A6-9230 has a higher turbo speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G1620T's GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2). Intel Celeron G1620T supports more threads (2) compared to AMD A6-9230's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD A6-9230 uses the socket, while Intel Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155 socket. AMD A6-9230 was launched in Q3 2017, while Intel Celeron G1620T was launched in Q1 2014. Intel Celeron G1620T has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD A6-9230's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD A6-9230 and Intel Celeron G1620T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD A6-9230 has a base speed of 2.6 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G1620T runs at 2.4 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD A6-9230 supports a turbo speed of 3.5 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G1620T.
  • Cores: The AMD A6-9230 has 2 cores, while the Intel Celeron G1620T has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD A6-9230 supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G1620T.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD A6-9230 uses the , while the Intel Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155.
  • Launch Date: The AMD A6-9230 was launched on Q3 2017, while the Intel Celeron G1620T was released on Q1 2014.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD A6-9230 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G1620T.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD A6-9230 Intel Celeron G1620T
AMD Intel
Manufacturer AMD Intel
Speed 2.6 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo 3.5 GHz GHz
Cores 2 2
Threads 2
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket LGA1155
Launched Q3 2017 Q1 2014
L3 Cache MB 2 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD A6-9230:



18%
Intel Celeron G1620T:
22%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD A6-9230



1%
Intel Celeron G1620T:
2%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD A6-9230: 15 watts



3.75%
Intel Celeron G1620T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD A6-9230 : Q3 2017 ✅

Intel Celeron G1620T : Q1 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD A6-9230



Intel Celeron G1620T


Pro's and Con's

AMD A6-9230 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD A6-9230 was launched more recently (Q3 2017) compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A6-9230 has a higher base clock speed of 2.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's 2.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A6-9230 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A6-9230 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's 36.48. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD A6-9230 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G1620T's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A6-9230 scores 1303, which is lower than the Intel Celeron G1620T's score of 1532. This makes the Intel Celeron G1620T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Intel Celeron G1620T – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1327, the Intel Celeron G1620T outperforms the AMD A6-9230 (score: 1124). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G1620T features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD A6-9230's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G1620T has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the AMD A6-9230's 15W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD A6-9230
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron G1620T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD A6-9230
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron G1620T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD A6-9230

The AMD A6-9230 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Celeron G1620T

The Intel Celeron G1620T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.