🚀 CPU Launch

AMD A6-9500 vs Intel Core i3-4160

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD A6-9500 and Intel Core i3-4160

AMD A6-9500 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-4160 is manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i3-4160 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD A6-9500's 3.5 GHz. AMD A6-9500 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4160's GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2). Intel Core i3-4160 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD A6-9500's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD A6-9500 uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core i3-4160 uses the FCLGA1150 socket. AMD A6-9500 was launched in Q4 2016, while Intel Core i3-4160 was launched in Q3 2014. Intel Core i3-4160 has a larger L3 cache of 3 MB compared to AMD A6-9500's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD A6-9500 and Intel Core i3-4160 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD A6-9500 has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-4160 runs at 3.6 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD A6-9500 supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-4160.
  • Cores: The AMD A6-9500 has 2 cores, while the Intel Core i3-4160 has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD A6-9500 supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-4160.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD A6-9500 uses the AM4, while the Intel Core i3-4160 uses the FCLGA1150.
  • Launch Date: The AMD A6-9500 was launched on Q4 2016, while the Intel Core i3-4160 was released on Q3 2014.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD A6-9500 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-4160.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD A6-9500 Intel Core i3-4160
AMD Intel
Manufacturer AMD Intel
Speed 3.5 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo 3.8 GHz GHz
Cores 2 2
Threads 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 FCLGA1150
Launched Q4 2016 Q3 2014
L3 Cache MB 3 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD A6-9500:



27%
Intel Core i3-4160:
33%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD A6-9500



2%
Intel Core i3-4160:
5%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD A6-9500: 65 watts



16.25%
Intel Core i3-4160: 54 watts
13.5%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD A6-9500 : Q4 2016 ✅

Intel Core i3-4160 : Q3 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD A6-9500



Intel Core i3-4160


Pro's and Con's

AMD A6-9500 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD A6-9500 was launched more recently (Q4 2016) compared to the Intel Core i3-4160 (Q3 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A6-9500 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4160's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD A6-9500 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-4160's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A6-9500 scores 1870, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-4160's score of 3522. This makes the Intel Core i3-4160 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A6-9500 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-4160's 54W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Core i3-4160 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-4160 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD A6-9500's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1997, the Intel Core i3-4160 outperforms the AMD A6-9500 (score: 1625). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-4160 features a larger L3 cache of 3MB compared to the AMD A6-9500's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-4160 has a higher CPU Mark score of 75.09 compared to the AMD A6-9500's 17.82. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Not available


Productivity


AMD A6-9500
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Core i3-4160
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD A6-9500
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Core i3-4160
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD A6-9500

The AMD A6-9500 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Core i3-4160

The Intel Core i3-4160 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.