Comparison between AMD A8-8650 and AMD Sempron 3850 APU
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD A8-8650 has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 1.3 GHz.
AMD A8-8650 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 3850 APU's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Sempron 3850 APU supports more threads (4) compared to AMD A8-8650's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD A8-8650 uses the FM2+ socket, while AMD Sempron 3850 APU uses the AM1,FS1b socket.
AMD A8-8650 was launched in Q4 2015, while AMD Sempron 3850 APU was launched in Q2 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD A8-8650 and AMD Sempron 3850 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD A8-8650 has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the AMD Sempron 3850 APU runs at 1.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD A8-8650 supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Sempron 3850 APU.
Cores: The AMD A8-8650 has 4 cores, while the AMD Sempron 3850 APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD A8-8650 supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Sempron 3850 APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD A8-8650 uses the FM2+, while the AMD Sempron 3850 APU uses the AM1,FS1b.
Launch Date: The AMD A8-8650 was launched on Q4 2015, while the AMD Sempron 3850 APU was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD A8-8650 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Sempron 3850 APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD A8-8650
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.2 GHz
1.3 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
AM1,FS1b
Launched
Q4 2015
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD A8-8650:
24%
AMD Sempron 3850 APU:
7%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD A8-8650
4%
AMD Sempron 3850 APU:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD A8-8650: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Sempron 3850 APU: 25 watts
6.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD A8-8650 : Q4 2015 ✅
AMD Sempron 3850 APU : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD A8-8650
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
Pro's and Con's
AMD A8-8650 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A8-8650 was launched more recently (Q4 2015) compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A8-8650 has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 1.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A8-8650 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1483, the AMD A8-8650 outperforms the AMD Sempron 3850 APU (score: 448). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A8-8650 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 24.31. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A8-8650 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A8-8650 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 25W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Sempron 3850 APU scores 1156, which is lower than the AMD A8-8650's score of 2996. This makes the AMD A8-8650 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD A8-8650
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD A8-8650
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD A8-8650
The AMD A8-8650 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
The AMD Sempron 3850 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.