Comparison between AMD A9-9430 and AMD Athlon X4 880K
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD A9-9430's 3.2 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD A9-9430's 3.5 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has more cores (4) compared to AMD A9-9430's 2 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD A9-9430 uses the socket, while AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+ socket.
AMD A9-9430 was launched in Q4 2017, while AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched in Q2 2016.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD A9-9430 and AMD Athlon X4 880K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD A9-9430 has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K runs at 4.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD A9-9430 supports a turbo speed of 3.5 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
Cores: The AMD A9-9430 has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD A9-9430 supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD A9-9430 uses the , while the AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The AMD A9-9430 was launched on Q4 2017, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K was released on Q2 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD A9-9430 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD A9-9430
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.2 GHz
4.0 GHz
Turbo
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
Launched
Q4 2017
Q2 2016
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD A9-9430:
24%
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
27%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD A9-9430
2%
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD A9-9430: watts
0%
AMD Athlon X4 880K: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD A9-9430 : Q4 2017 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 880K : Q2 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD A9-9430
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Pro's and Con's
AMD A9-9430 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A9-9430 was launched more recently (Q4 2017) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A9-9430 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 38.71. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD A9-9430 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A9-9430 scores 1689, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 880K's score of 3663. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 880K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Athlon X4 880K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9430's 3.2 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9430's 3.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1633, the AMD Athlon X4 880K outperforms the AMD A9-9430 (score: 1445). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD A9-9430's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD A9-9430
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 880K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD A9-9430
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD A9-9430
The AMD A9-9430 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 880K
The AMD Athlon X4 880K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
