🚀 CPU Launch

AMD A9-9430 vs AMD FX-770K Quad-Core

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD A9-9430 and AMD FX-770K Quad-Core

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to AMD A9-9430's 3.2 GHz. AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to AMD A9-9430's 3.5 GHz. AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has more cores (4) compared to AMD A9-9430's 2 cores. Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD A9-9430 uses the socket, while AMD FX-770K Quad-Core uses the FM2+ socket. AMD A9-9430 was launched in Q4 2017, while AMD FX-770K Quad-Core was launched in Q4 2014. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD A9-9430 and AMD FX-770K Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD A9-9430 has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core runs at 3.5 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD A9-9430 supports a turbo speed of 3.5 GHz, compared to 3.9 GHz for the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core.
  • Cores: The AMD A9-9430 has 2 cores, while the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD A9-9430 supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD A9-9430 uses the , while the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core uses the FM2+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD A9-9430 was launched on Q4 2017, while the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core was released on Q4 2014.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD A9-9430 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD A9-9430 AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.2 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo 3.5 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores 2 4
Threads
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FM2+
Launched Q4 2017 Q4 2014
L3 Cache MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD A9-9430:



24%
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core:
24%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD A9-9430



2%
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core:
4%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD A9-9430: watts



0%
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD A9-9430 : Q4 2017 ✅

AMD FX-770K Quad-Core : Q4 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD A9-9430



AMD FX-770K Quad-Core


Pro's and Con's

AMD A9-9430 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD A9-9430 was launched more recently (Q4 2017) compared to the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core (Q4 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The AMD A9-9430 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A9-9430 scores 1689, which is lower than the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core's score of 3060. This makes the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD FX-770K Quad-Core – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9430's 3.2 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9430's 3.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1468, the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core outperforms the AMD A9-9430 (score: 1445). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD A9-9430's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD A9-9430
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD A9-9430
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD A9-9430

The AMD A9-9430 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD FX-770K Quad-Core

The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.