🚀 CPU Launch

AMD A9-9820 vs AMD A8-9600

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD A9-9820 and AMD A8-9600

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD A8-9600 has a higher base speed of 3.1 GHz compared to AMD A9-9820's 2.3 GHz. AMD A8-9600 has a higher turbo speed of 3.4 GHz compared to AMD A9-9820's 2.4 GHz. AMD A9-9820 has more cores (8) compared to AMD A8-9600's 4 cores. AMD A9-9820 supports more threads (8) compared to AMD A8-9600's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD A9-9820 uses the socket, while AMD A8-9600 uses the AM4 socket. AMD A9-9820 was launched in Q2 2021, while AMD A8-9600 was launched in Q2 2017. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD A9-9820 and AMD A8-9600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD A9-9820 has a base speed of 2.3 GHz, while the AMD A8-9600 runs at 3.1 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD A9-9820 supports a turbo speed of 2.4 GHz, compared to 3.4 GHz for the AMD A8-9600.
  • Cores: The AMD A9-9820 has 8 cores, while the AMD A8-9600 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD A9-9820 supports 8 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A8-9600.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD A9-9820 uses the , while the AMD A8-9600 uses the AM4.
  • Launch Date: The AMD A9-9820 was launched on Q2 2021, while the AMD A8-9600 was released on Q2 2017.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD A9-9820 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A8-9600.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD A9-9820 AMD A8-9600
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 2.3 GHz 3.1 GHz
Turbo 2.4 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores 8 4
Threads 8
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4
Launched Q2 2021 Q2 2017
L3 Cache MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD A9-9820:



13%
AMD A8-9600:
24%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD A9-9820



5%
AMD A8-9600:
4%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD A9-9820: watts



0%
AMD A8-9600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD A9-9820 : Q2 2021 ✅

AMD A8-9600 : Q2 2017 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD A9-9820



AMD A8-9600


Pro's and Con's

AMD A9-9820 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD A9-9820 was launched more recently (Q2 2021) compared to the AMD A8-9600 (Q2 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A9-9820 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD A8-9600's 29.46. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Not available

AMD A8-9600 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A8-9600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.1 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9820's 2.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A8-9600 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9820's 2.4 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1490, the AMD A8-9600 outperforms the AMD A9-9820 (score: 800). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The AMD A8-9600 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A9-9820's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The AMD A8-9600 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD A9-9820's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A8-9600 scores 3314, which is lower than the AMD A9-9820's score of 3938. This makes the AMD A9-9820 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A8-9600 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD A9-9820's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD A9-9820
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD A8-9600
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD A9-9820
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD A8-9600
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD A9-9820

The AMD A9-9820 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD A8-9600

The AMD A8-9600 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.