🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-A9-9820-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-2700

AMD A9-9820 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD A9-9820 and AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD Ryzen 7 2700 has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to AMD A9-9820's 2.3 GHz. AMD Ryzen 7 2700 has a higher turbo speed of 4.1 GHz compared to AMD A9-9820's 2.4 GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (8). AMD Ryzen 7 2700 supports more threads (16) compared to AMD A9-9820's 8 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD A9-9820 uses the socket, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 uses the AM4 socket. AMD A9-9820 was launched in Q2 2021, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 was launched in Q2 2018. AMD Ryzen 7 2700 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD A9-9820's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD A9-9820 and AMD Ryzen 7 2700 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD A9-9820 has a base speed of 2.3 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 runs at 3.2 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD A9-9820 supports a turbo speed of 2.4 GHz, compared to 4.1 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700.
  • Cores: The AMD A9-9820 has 8 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 has 8 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD A9-9820 supports 8 threads, compared to 16 threads for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD A9-9820 uses the , while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 uses the AM4.
  • Launch Date: The AMD A9-9820 was launched on Q2 2021, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 was released on Q2 2018.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD A9-9820 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD A9-9820 AMD Ryzen 7 2700
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 2.3 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo 2.4 GHz 4.1 GHz
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 16
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4
Launched Q2 2021 Q2 2018
L3 Cache MB 16 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD A9-9820:



13%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700:
36%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD A9-9820



5%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700:
22%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD A9-9820: watts



0%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD A9-9820 : Q2 2021 ✅

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 : Q2 2018 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD A9-9820



AMD Ryzen 7 2700


Pro's and Con's

AMD A9-9820 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD A9-9820 was launched more recently (Q2 2021) compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (Q2 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A9-9820 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700's 201.20. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD A9-9820 has 8 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 2700's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A9-9820 scores 3938, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 2700's score of 15694. This makes the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9820's 2.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9820's 2.4 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2178, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the AMD A9-9820 (score: 800). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD A9-9820's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD A9-9820's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD A9-9820
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD A9-9820
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD A9-9820

The AMD A9-9820 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.