Comparison between AMD A9-9820 and Intel Celeron G3900T
AMD A9-9820 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Celeron G3900T has a higher base speed of 2.6 GHz compared to AMD A9-9820's 2.3 GHz.
AMD A9-9820 has a higher turbo speed of 2.4 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900T's GHz.
AMD A9-9820 has more cores (8) compared to Intel Celeron G3900T's 2 cores.
AMD A9-9820 supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Celeron G3900T's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Both CPUs use the same socket type: .
AMD A9-9820 was launched in Q2 2021, while Intel Celeron G3900T was launched in Q2 2016.
Intel Celeron G3900T has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD A9-9820's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD A9-9820 and Intel Celeron G3900T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD A9-9820 has a base speed of 2.3 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3900T runs at 2.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD A9-9820 supports a turbo speed of 2.4 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3900T.
Cores: The AMD A9-9820 has 8 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3900T has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD A9-9820 supports 8 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3900T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD A9-9820 uses the , while the Intel Celeron G3900T uses the .
Launch Date: The AMD A9-9820 was launched on Q2 2021, while the Intel Celeron G3900T was released on Q2 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD A9-9820 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3900T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD A9-9820
Intel Celeron G3900T
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Turbo
2.4 GHz
GHz
Cores
8
2
Threads
8
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
Launched
Q2 2021
Q2 2016
L3 Cache
MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD A9-9820:
13%
Intel Celeron G3900T:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD A9-9820
5%
Intel Celeron G3900T:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD A9-9820: watts
0%
Intel Celeron G3900T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD A9-9820 : Q2 2021 ✅
Intel Celeron G3900T : Q2 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD A9-9820
Intel Celeron G3900T
Pro's and Con's
AMD A9-9820 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A9-9820 was launched more recently (Q2 2021) compared to the Intel Celeron G3900T (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A9-9820 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.4 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A9-9820 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G3900T's 17.96. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
Intel Celeron G3900T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G3900T has a higher base clock speed of 2.6 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9820's 2.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1560, the Intel Celeron G3900T outperforms the AMD A9-9820 (score: 800). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3900T features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD A9-9820's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A9-9820's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G3900T has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD A9-9820's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3900T scores 2020, which is lower than the AMD A9-9820's score of 3938. This makes the AMD A9-9820 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G3900T has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the AMD A9-9820's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD A9-9820
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G3900T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD A9-9820
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G3900T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD A9-9820
The AMD A9-9820 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G3900T
The Intel Celeron G3900T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
