Comparison between AMD A9-9820 and Intel Core i3-3250T
AMD A9-9820 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-3250T is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-3250T has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to AMD A9-9820's 2.3 GHz.
AMD A9-9820 has a higher turbo speed of 2.4 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's GHz.
AMD A9-9820 has more cores (8) compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 2 cores.
AMD A9-9820 supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD A9-9820 uses the socket, while Intel Core i3-3250T uses the FCLGA1155 socket.
AMD A9-9820 was launched in Q2 2021, while Intel Core i3-3250T was launched in Q1 2016.
Intel Core i3-3250T has a larger L3 cache of 3 MB compared to AMD A9-9820's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD A9-9820 and Intel Core i3-3250T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD A9-9820 has a base speed of 2.3 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-3250T runs at 3.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD A9-9820 supports a turbo speed of 2.4 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Cores: The AMD A9-9820 has 8 cores, while the Intel Core i3-3250T has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD A9-9820 supports 8 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD A9-9820 uses the , while the Intel Core i3-3250T uses the FCLGA1155.
Launch Date: The AMD A9-9820 was launched on Q2 2021, while the Intel Core i3-3250T was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD A9-9820 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD A9-9820
Intel Core i3-3250T
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
2.3 GHz
3.0 GHz
Turbo
2.4 GHz
GHz
Cores
8
2
Threads
8
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1155
Launched
Q2 2021
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
MB
3 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD A9-9820:
13%
Intel Core i3-3250T:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD A9-9820
5%
Intel Core i3-3250T:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD A9-9820: watts
0%
Intel Core i3-3250T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD A9-9820 : Q2 2021 ✅
Intel Core i3-3250T : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD A9-9820
Intel Core i3-3250T
Pro's and Con's
AMD A9-9820 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A9-9820 was launched more recently (Q2 2021) compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A9-9820 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.4 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Not available
Intel Core i3-3250T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-3250T has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9820's 2.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1684, the Intel Core i3-3250T outperforms the AMD A9-9820 (score: 800). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-3250T features a larger L3 cache of 3MB compared to the AMD A9-9820's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-3250T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A9-9820's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-3250T has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD A9-9820's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-3250T scores 2650, which is lower than the AMD A9-9820's score of 3938. This makes the AMD A9-9820 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-3250T has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the AMD A9-9820's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD A9-9820
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-3250T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD A9-9820
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-3250T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD A9-9820
The AMD A9-9820 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-3250T
The Intel Core i3-3250T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
