Comparison between AMD A9-9820 and Intel Core i3-7101E
AMD A9-9820 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-7101E is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-7101E has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to AMD A9-9820's 2.3 GHz.
AMD A9-9820 has a higher turbo speed of 2.4 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-7101E's GHz.
AMD A9-9820 has more cores (8) compared to Intel Core i3-7101E's 2 cores.
AMD A9-9820 supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Core i3-7101E's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD A9-9820 uses the socket, while Intel Core i3-7101E uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
AMD A9-9820 was launched in Q2 2021, while Intel Core i3-7101E was launched in Q1 2020.
Intel Core i3-7101E has a larger L3 cache of 3 MB compared to AMD A9-9820's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD A9-9820 and Intel Core i3-7101E are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD A9-9820 has a base speed of 2.3 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-7101E runs at 3.9 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD A9-9820 supports a turbo speed of 2.4 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-7101E.
Cores: The AMD A9-9820 has 8 cores, while the Intel Core i3-7101E has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD A9-9820 supports 8 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-7101E.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD A9-9820 uses the , while the Intel Core i3-7101E uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The AMD A9-9820 was launched on Q2 2021, while the Intel Core i3-7101E was released on Q1 2020.
L3 Cache: The AMD A9-9820 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-7101E.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD A9-9820
Intel Core i3-7101E
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Turbo
2.4 GHz
GHz
Cores
8
2
Threads
8
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q2 2021
Q1 2020
L3 Cache
MB
3 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD A9-9820:
13%
Intel Core i3-7101E:
40%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD A9-9820
5%
Intel Core i3-7101E:
6%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD A9-9820: watts
0%
Intel Core i3-7101E: 54 watts
13.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD A9-9820 : Q2 2021 ✅
Intel Core i3-7101E : Q1 2020 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD A9-9820
Intel Core i3-7101E
Pro's and Con's
AMD A9-9820 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A9-9820 was launched more recently (Q2 2021) compared to the Intel Core i3-7101E (Q1 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A9-9820 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.4 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-7101E's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A9-9820 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i3-7101E's 37.87. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A9-9820 scores 3938, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-7101E's score of 4430. This makes the Intel Core i3-7101E a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Intel Core i3-7101E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-7101E has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9820's 2.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2407, the Intel Core i3-7101E outperforms the AMD A9-9820 (score: 800). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-7101E features a larger L3 cache of 3MB compared to the AMD A9-9820's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-7101E has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A9-9820's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-7101E has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD A9-9820's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-7101E has a higher TDP of 54W compared to the AMD A9-9820's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD A9-9820
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-7101E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD A9-9820
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-7101E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD A9-9820
The AMD A9-9820 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-7101E
The Intel Core i3-7101E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
