Comparison between AMD Athlon 200GE and AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 200GE's 3.2 GHz.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 200GE's 3.2 GHz.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has more cores (4) compared to AMD Athlon 200GE's 2 cores.
AMD Athlon 200GE supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FX-770K Quad-Core's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon 200GE uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-770K Quad-Core uses the FM2+ socket.
AMD Athlon 200GE was launched in Q3 2018, while AMD FX-770K Quad-Core was launched in Q4 2014.
AMD Athlon 200GE has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD FX-770K Quad-Core's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon 200GE and AMD FX-770K Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon 200GE has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 200GE supports a turbo speed of 3.2 GHz, compared to 3.9 GHz for the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core.
Cores: The AMD Athlon 200GE has 2 cores, while the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon 200GE supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon 200GE uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 200GE was launched on Q3 2018, while the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core was released on Q4 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 200GE has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon 200GE
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
3.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FM2+
Launched
Q3 2018
Q4 2014
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 200GE:
30%
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 200GE
5%
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon 200GE: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon 200GE : Q3 2018 ✅
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core : Q4 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon 200GE
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon 200GE – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1800, the AMD Athlon 200GE outperforms the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core (score: 1468). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 200GE features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon 200GE has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core was launched more recently (Q4 2014) compared to the AMD Athlon 200GE (Q3 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 200GE's 3.2 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 200GE's 3.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon 200GE's 33.23. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 200GE's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core scores 3060, which is lower than the AMD Athlon 200GE's score of 4117. This makes the AMD Athlon 200GE a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Athlon 200GE's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon 200GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon 200GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon 200GE
The AMD Athlon 200GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
