Comparison between AMD Athlon 240GE and AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 240GE's 3.5 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has a higher turbo speed of 4.1 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 240GE's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has more cores (6) compared to AMD Athlon 240GE's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 supports more threads (6) compared to AMD Athlon 240GE's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Both CPUs use the same socket type: AM4.
AMD Athlon 240GE was launched in Q1 2019, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500 was launched in Q4 2019.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD Athlon 240GE's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon 240GE and AMD Ryzen 5 3500 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon 240GE has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3500 runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 240GE supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.1 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 3500.
Cores: The AMD Athlon 240GE has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon 240GE supports 4 threads, compared to 6 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 3500.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon 240GE uses the AM4, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3500 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 240GE was launched on Q1 2019, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3500 was released on Q4 2019.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 240GE has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 3500.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon 240GE
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.1 GHz
Cores
2
6
Threads
4
6
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM4
Launched
Q1 2019
Q4 2019
L3 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 240GE:
32%
AMD Ryzen 5 3500:
41%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 240GE
6%
AMD Ryzen 5 3500:
18%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon 240GE: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD Ryzen 5 3500: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon 240GE : Q1 2019 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 : Q4 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon 240GE
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon 240GE – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon 240GE has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 3500's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon 240GE has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 3500's 6 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon 240GE scores 4527, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 3500's score of 12788. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 3500 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD Athlon 240GE (Q1 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 240GE's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 240GE's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2501, the AMD Ryzen 5 3500 outperforms the AMD Athlon 240GE (score: 1963). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD Athlon 240GE's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has a higher CPU Mark score of 148.71 compared to the AMD Athlon 240GE's 46.07. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Athlon 240GE's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon 240GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon 240GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon 240GE
The AMD Athlon 240GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
