Comparison between AMD Athlon 240GE and Intel Core i3-8100
AMD Athlon 240GE is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-8100 is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-8100 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 240GE's 3.5 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Intel Core i3-8100 has more cores (4) compared to AMD Athlon 240GE's 2 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon 240GE uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core i3-8100 uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket.
AMD Athlon 240GE was launched in Q1 2019, while Intel Core i3-8100 was launched in Q4 2017.
Intel Core i3-8100 has a larger L3 cache of 6 MB compared to AMD Athlon 240GE's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon 240GE and Intel Core i3-8100 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon 240GE has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-8100 runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 240GE supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-8100.
Cores: The AMD Athlon 240GE has 2 cores, while the Intel Core i3-8100 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon 240GE supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-8100.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon 240GE uses the AM4, while the Intel Core i3-8100 uses the FCLGA1151-2.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 240GE was launched on Q1 2019, while the Intel Core i3-8100 was released on Q4 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 240GE has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 6 MB for the Intel Core i3-8100.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon 240GE
Intel Core i3-8100
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA1151-2
Launched
Q1 2019
Q4 2017
L3 Cache
4 MB
6 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 240GE:
32%
Intel Core i3-8100:
36%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 240GE
6%
Intel Core i3-8100:
8%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon 240GE: 35 watts
8.75%
Intel Core i3-8100: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon 240GE : Q1 2019 ✅
Intel Core i3-8100 : Q4 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon 240GE
Intel Core i3-8100
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon 240GE – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon 240GE has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-8100's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon 240GE scores 4527, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-8100's score of 6101. This makes the Intel Core i3-8100 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Intel Core i3-8100 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-8100 was launched more recently (Q4 2017) compared to the AMD Athlon 240GE (Q1 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-8100 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 240GE's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2214, the Intel Core i3-8100 outperforms the AMD Athlon 240GE (score: 1963). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-8100 features a larger L3 cache of 6MB compared to the AMD Athlon 240GE's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-8100 has a higher CPU Mark score of 155.21 compared to the AMD Athlon 240GE's 46.07. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-8100 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Athlon 240GE's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon 240GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-8100
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon 240GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-8100
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon 240GE
The AMD Athlon 240GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-8100
The Intel Core i3-8100 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.