🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-Athlon-3000G-vs-AMD-A9-9430

AMD Athlon 3000G vs AMD A9-9430

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD A9-9430

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to AMD A9-9430's 3.2 GHz. AMD A9-9430 has a higher turbo speed of 3.5 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2). AMD Athlon 3000G supports more threads (4) compared to AMD A9-9430's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4 socket, while AMD A9-9430 uses the socket. AMD Athlon 3000G was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD A9-9430 was launched in Q4 2017. AMD Athlon 3000G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD A9-9430's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD A9-9430 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD A9-9430 runs at 3.2 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 3000G supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.5 GHz for the AMD A9-9430.
  • Cores: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores, while the AMD A9-9430 has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Athlon 3000G supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A9-9430.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4, while the AMD A9-9430 uses the .
  • Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD A9-9430 was released on Q4 2017.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A9-9430.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Athlon 3000G AMD A9-9430
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.5 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores 2 2
Threads 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4
Launched Q4 2019 Q4 2017
L3 Cache 4 MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Athlon 3000G:



32%
AMD A9-9430:
24%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Athlon 3000G



6%
AMD A9-9430:
2%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Athlon 3000G: 35 watts



8.75%
AMD A9-9430: watts
0%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Athlon 3000G : Q4 2019 ✅

AMD A9-9430 : Q4 2017 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Athlon 3000G



AMD A9-9430


Pro's and Con's

AMD Athlon 3000G – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD A9-9430 (Q4 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9430's 3.2 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1979, the AMD Athlon 3000G outperforms the AMD A9-9430 (score: 1445). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 3000G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD A9-9430's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the AMD A9-9430's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

AMD A9-9430 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A9-9430 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A9-9430 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 49.74. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD A9-9430 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 3000G's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A9-9430 scores 1689, which is lower than the AMD Athlon 3000G's score of 4477. This makes the AMD Athlon 3000G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


AMD Athlon 3000G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD A9-9430
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Athlon 3000G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD A9-9430
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Athlon 3000G

The AMD Athlon 3000G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD A9-9430

The AMD A9-9430 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.