Comparison between AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD FX-4330
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-4330 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 3.5 GHz.
AMD FX-4330 has a higher turbo speed of 4.1 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's GHz.
AMD FX-4330 has more cores (4) compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 2 cores.
AMD Athlon 3000G supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FX-4330's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-4330 uses the AM3+ socket.
AMD Athlon 3000G was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD FX-4330 was launched in Q4 2015.
AMD FX-4330 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD FX-4330 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD FX-4330 runs at 4.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 3000G supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.1 GHz for the AMD FX-4330.
Cores: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores, while the AMD FX-4330 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon 3000G supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-4330.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-4330 uses the AM3+.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD FX-4330 was released on Q4 2015.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the AMD FX-4330.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon 3000G
AMD FX-4330
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
4.0 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.1 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM3+
Launched
Q4 2019
Q4 2015
L3 Cache
4 MB
8 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 3000G:
32%
AMD FX-4330:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 3000G
6%
AMD FX-4330:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon 3000G: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD FX-4330: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon 3000G : Q4 2019 ✅
AMD FX-4330 : Q4 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon 3000G
AMD FX-4330
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon 3000G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD FX-4330 (Q4 2015). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1979, the AMD Athlon 3000G outperforms the AMD FX-4330 (score: 1563). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher CPU Mark score of 49.74 compared to the AMD FX-4330's 4.29. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-4330's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
AMD FX-4330 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4330 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4330 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4330 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4330 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 3000G's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4330 scores 3146, which is lower than the AMD Athlon 3000G's score of 4477. This makes the AMD Athlon 3000G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4330 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon 3000G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-4330
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon 3000G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-4330
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon 3000G
The AMD Athlon 3000G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-4330
The AMD FX-4330 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
