🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-Athlon-3000G-vs-AMD-Ryzen-3-1200

AMD Athlon 3000G vs AMD Ryzen 3 1200

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD Ryzen 3 1200

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 3 1200's 3.1 GHz. AMD Ryzen 3 1200 has a higher turbo speed of 3.4 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's GHz. AMD Ryzen 3 1200 has more cores (4) compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 2 cores. Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Both CPUs use the same socket type: AM4. AMD Athlon 3000G was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 was launched in Q2 2017. AMD Ryzen 3 1200 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 4 MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD Ryzen 3 1200 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 1200 runs at 3.1 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 3000G supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.4 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 3 1200.
  • Cores: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 3 1200 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Athlon 3000G supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Ryzen 3 1200.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4, while the AMD Ryzen 3 1200 uses the AM4.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD Ryzen 3 1200 was released on Q2 2017.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the AMD Ryzen 3 1200.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Athlon 3000G AMD Ryzen 3 1200
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.5 GHz 3.1 GHz
Turbo GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores 2 4
Threads 4 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 AM4
Launched Q4 2019 Q2 2017
L3 Cache 4 MB 8 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Athlon 3000G:



32%
AMD Ryzen 3 1200:
32%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Athlon 3000G



6%
AMD Ryzen 3 1200:
9%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Athlon 3000G: 35 watts



8.75%
AMD Ryzen 3 1200: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Athlon 3000G : Q4 2019 ✅

AMD Ryzen 3 1200 : Q2 2017 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Athlon 3000G



AMD Ryzen 3 1200


Pro's and Con's

AMD Athlon 3000G – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 1200 (Q2 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 1200's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1979, the AMD Athlon 3000G outperforms the AMD Ryzen 3 1200 (score: 1929). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 1200's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon 3000G scores 4477, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 1200's score of 6282. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 1200 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD Ryzen 3 1200 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 1200 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 1200 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 3 1200 has a higher CPU Mark score of 73.91 compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 49.74. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 3 1200 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD Athlon 3000G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Ryzen 3 1200
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Athlon 3000G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Ryzen 3 1200
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Athlon 3000G

The AMD Athlon 3000G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Ryzen 3 1200

The AMD Ryzen 3 1200 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.