Comparison between AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 3.5 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has more cores (6) compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X supports more threads (12) compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Both CPUs use the same socket type: AM4.
AMD Athlon 3000G was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X was launched in Q2 2017.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD Ryzen 5 1600X are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 3000G supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X.
Cores: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon 3000G supports 4 threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X was released on Q2 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon 3000G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
2
6
Threads
4
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM4
Launched
Q4 2019
Q2 2017
L3 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 3000G:
32%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X:
36%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 3000G
6%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X:
18%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon 3000G: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon 3000G : Q4 2019 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X : Q2 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon 3000G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon 3000G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X (Q2 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon 3000G scores 4477, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X's score of 13042. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2198, the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the AMD Athlon 3000G (score: 1979). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has a higher CPU Mark score of 190.67 compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 49.74. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon 3000G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon 3000G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon 3000G
The AMD Athlon 3000G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
