Comparison between AMD Athlon 300GE and AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 300GE's 3.4 GHz.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher turbo speed of 4.3 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 300GE's GHz.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has more cores (4) compared to AMD Athlon 300GE's 2 cores.
AMD Athlon 300GE supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon 300GE uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-670K Quad-Core uses the FM2 socket.
AMD Athlon 300GE was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD FX-670K Quad-Core was launched in Q2 2014.
AMD Athlon 300GE has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon 300GE and AMD FX-670K Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon 300GE has a base speed of 3.4 GHz, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 300GE supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.3 GHz for the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core.
Cores: The AMD Athlon 300GE has 2 cores, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon 300GE supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon 300GE uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 300GE was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 300GE has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon 300GE
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.3 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FM2
Launched
Q4 2019
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 300GE:
31%
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 300GE
6%
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon 300GE: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon 300GE : Q4 2019 ✅
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon 300GE
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon 300GE – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 300GE was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1869, the AMD Athlon 300GE outperforms the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core (score: 1578). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 300GE features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon 300GE has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 300GE's 3.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 300GE's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 300GE's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core scores 2980, which is lower than the AMD Athlon 300GE's score of 4273. This makes the AMD Athlon 300GE a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Athlon 300GE's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon 300GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon 300GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon 300GE
The AMD Athlon 300GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
