🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-Athlon-300GE-vs-Intel-Celeron-G3900

AMD Athlon 300GE vs Intel Celeron G3900

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Athlon 300GE and Intel Celeron G3900

AMD Athlon 300GE is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel. AMD Athlon 300GE has a higher base speed of 3.4 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz. Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2). AMD Athlon 300GE supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Athlon 300GE uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151 socket. AMD Athlon 300GE was launched in Q4 2019, while Intel Celeron G3900 was launched in Q1 2016. AMD Athlon 300GE has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Athlon 300GE and Intel Celeron G3900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Athlon 300GE has a base speed of 3.4 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3900 runs at 2.8 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 300GE supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3900.
  • Cores: The AMD Athlon 300GE has 2 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Athlon 300GE supports 4 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3900.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Athlon 300GE uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 300GE was launched on Q4 2019, while the Intel Celeron G3900 was released on Q1 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 300GE has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3900.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Athlon 300GE Intel Celeron G3900
AMD Intel
Manufacturer AMD Intel
Speed 3.4 GHz 2.8 GHz
Turbo GHz GHz
Cores 2 2
Threads 4 2
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 FCLGA1151
Launched Q4 2019 Q1 2016
L3 Cache 4 MB 2 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Athlon 300GE:



31%
Intel Celeron G3900:
28%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Athlon 300GE



6%
Intel Celeron G3900:
3%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Athlon 300GE: 35 watts



8.75%
Intel Celeron G3900: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Athlon 300GE : Q4 2019 ✅

Intel Celeron G3900 : Q1 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Athlon 300GE



Intel Celeron G3900


Pro's and Con's

AMD Athlon 300GE – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 300GE was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the Intel Celeron G3900 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon 300GE has a higher base clock speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1869, the AMD Athlon 300GE outperforms the Intel Celeron G3900 (score: 1690). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 300GE features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon 300GE has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 134.42. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Not available

Intel Celeron G3900 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Not available

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 300GE's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3900 scores 2148, which is lower than the AMD Athlon 300GE's score of 4273. This makes the AMD Athlon 300GE a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher TDP of 51W compared to the AMD Athlon 300GE's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD Athlon 300GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron G3900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Athlon 300GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron G3900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Athlon 300GE

The AMD Athlon 300GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Celeron G3900

The Intel Celeron G3900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.