🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-Athlon-320GE-vs-AMD-A8-8650

AMD Athlon 320GE vs AMD A8-8650

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Athlon 320GE and AMD A8-8650

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD Athlon 320GE has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to AMD A8-8650's 3.2 GHz. AMD A8-8650 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 320GE's GHz. AMD A8-8650 has more cores (4) compared to AMD Athlon 320GE's 2 cores. AMD Athlon 320GE supports more threads (4) compared to AMD A8-8650's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Athlon 320GE uses the AM4 socket, while AMD A8-8650 uses the FM2+ socket. AMD Athlon 320GE was launched in Q3 2021, while AMD A8-8650 was launched in Q4 2015. AMD Athlon 320GE has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD A8-8650's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Athlon 320GE and AMD A8-8650 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Athlon 320GE has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD A8-8650 runs at 3.2 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 320GE supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD A8-8650.
  • Cores: The AMD Athlon 320GE has 2 cores, while the AMD A8-8650 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Athlon 320GE supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A8-8650.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Athlon 320GE uses the AM4, while the AMD A8-8650 uses the FM2+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 320GE was launched on Q3 2021, while the AMD A8-8650 was released on Q4 2015.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 320GE has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A8-8650.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Athlon 320GE AMD A8-8650
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.5 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores 2 4
Threads 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 FM2+
Launched Q3 2021 Q4 2015
L3 Cache 4 MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Athlon 320GE:



32%
AMD A8-8650:
24%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Athlon 320GE



6%
AMD A8-8650:
4%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Athlon 320GE: 35 watts



8.75%
AMD A8-8650: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Athlon 320GE : Q3 2021 ✅

AMD A8-8650 : Q4 2015 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Athlon 320GE



AMD A8-8650


Pro's and Con's

AMD Athlon 320GE – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon 320GE has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the AMD A8-8650's 3.2 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1929, the AMD Athlon 320GE outperforms the AMD A8-8650 (score: 1483). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 320GE features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD A8-8650's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon 320GE has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A8-8650's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.

AMD A8-8650 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD A8-8650 was launched more recently (Q4 2015) compared to the AMD Athlon 320GE (Q3 2021). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A8-8650 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 320GE's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD A8-8650 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 320GE's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A8-8650 scores 2996, which is lower than the AMD Athlon 320GE's score of 4399. This makes the AMD Athlon 320GE a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A8-8650 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Athlon 320GE's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD Athlon 320GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD A8-8650
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Athlon 320GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD A8-8650
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Athlon 320GE

The AMD Athlon 320GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD A8-8650

The AMD A8-8650 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.