🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-Athlon-320GE-vs-AMD-FX-4320

AMD Athlon 320GE vs AMD FX-4320

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Athlon 320GE and AMD FX-4320

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 320GE's 3.5 GHz. AMD FX-4320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 320GE's GHz. AMD FX-4320 has more cores (4) compared to AMD Athlon 320GE's 2 cores. AMD Athlon 320GE supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Athlon 320GE uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket. AMD Athlon 320GE was launched in Q3 2021, while AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 4 MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Athlon 320GE and AMD FX-4320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Athlon 320GE has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD FX-4320 runs at 4.0 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 320GE supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-4320.
  • Cores: The AMD Athlon 320GE has 2 cores, while the AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Athlon 320GE supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-4320.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Athlon 320GE uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 320GE was launched on Q3 2021, while the AMD FX-4320 was released on Q1 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 320GE has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD FX-4320.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Athlon 320GE AMD FX-4320
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.5 GHz 4.0 GHz
Turbo GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores 2 4
Threads 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 AM3+
Launched Q3 2021 Q1 2016
L3 Cache 4 MB 4 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Athlon 320GE:



32%
AMD FX-4320:
26%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Athlon 320GE



6%
AMD FX-4320:
4%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Athlon 320GE: 35 watts



8.75%
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Athlon 320GE : Q3 2021 ✅

AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Athlon 320GE



AMD FX-4320


Pro's and Con's

AMD Athlon 320GE – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 320GE was launched more recently (Q3 2021) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1929, the AMD Athlon 320GE outperforms the AMD FX-4320 (score: 1564). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon 320GE has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-4320's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.

AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 320GE's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 320GE's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 320GE's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4320 scores 3150, which is lower than the AMD Athlon 320GE's score of 4399. This makes the AMD Athlon 320GE a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Athlon 320GE's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD Athlon 320GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Athlon 320GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Athlon 320GE

The AMD Athlon 320GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD FX-4320

The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.