Comparison between AMD Athlon 320GE and Intel Celeron J4025
AMD Athlon 320GE is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Athlon 320GE has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz.
Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher turbo speed of 2.9 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 320GE's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
AMD Athlon 320GE supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon 320GE uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket.
AMD Athlon 320GE was launched in Q3 2021, while Intel Celeron J4025 was launched in Q1 2020.
AMD Athlon 320GE has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Celeron J4025's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon 320GE and Intel Celeron J4025 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon 320GE has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J4025 runs at 2.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 320GE supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 2.9 GHz for the Intel Celeron J4025.
Cores: The AMD Athlon 320GE has 2 cores, while the Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon 320GE supports 4 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron J4025.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon 320GE uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 320GE was launched on Q3 2021, while the Intel Celeron J4025 was released on Q1 2020.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 320GE has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J4025.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon 320GE
Intel Celeron J4025
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.5 GHz
2.0 GHz
Turbo
GHz
2.9 GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
4
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1090
Launched
Q3 2021
Q1 2020
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 320GE:
32%
Intel Celeron J4025:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 320GE
6%
Intel Celeron J4025:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon 320GE: 35 watts
8.75%
Intel Celeron J4025: 10 watts
2.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon 320GE : Q3 2021 ✅
Intel Celeron J4025 : Q1 2020 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon 320GE
Intel Celeron J4025
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon 320GE – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 320GE was launched more recently (Q3 2021) compared to the Intel Celeron J4025 (Q1 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon 320GE has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1929, the AMD Athlon 320GE outperforms the Intel Celeron J4025 (score: 1147). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 320GE features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon 320GE has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron J4025 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.9 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 320GE's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 320GE's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4025 scores 1477, which is lower than the AMD Athlon 320GE's score of 4399. This makes the AMD Athlon 320GE a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Athlon 320GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J4025
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon 320GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J4025
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon 320GE
The AMD Athlon 320GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J4025
The Intel Celeron J4025 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.