Comparison between AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and AMD FX-4320
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 3.5 GHz.
AMD FX-4320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 3.9 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket.
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was launched in Q3 2020, while AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and AMD FX-4320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD FX-4320 runs at 4.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G supports a turbo speed of 3.9 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-4320.
Cores: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has 4 cores, while the AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-4320.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was launched on Q3 2020, while the AMD FX-4320 was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD FX-4320.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
AMD FX-4320
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
4.0 GHz
Turbo
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM3+
Launched
Q3 2020
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G:
38%
AMD FX-4320:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
11%
AMD FX-4320:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G : Q3 2020 ✅
AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
AMD FX-4320
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2321, the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G outperforms the AMD FX-4320 (score: 1564). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Not available
AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 3.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4320 scores 3150, which is lower than the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's score of 7702. This makes the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-4320
The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
