Comparison between AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and AMD FirePro A320 APU
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 3.5 GHz.
AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 3.9 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2 socket.
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was launched in Q3 2020, while AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched in Q3 2016.
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and AMD FirePro A320 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU runs at 3.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G supports a turbo speed of 3.9 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Cores: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has 4 cores, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was launched on Q3 2020, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU was released on Q3 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Turbo
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FM2
Launched
Q3 2020
Q3 2016
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G:
38%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
11%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD FirePro A320 APU: 100 watts
25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G : Q3 2020 ✅
AMD FirePro A320 APU : Q3 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU (Q3 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2321, the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G outperforms the AMD FirePro A320 APU (score: 1193). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD FirePro A320 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 3.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FirePro A320 APU scores 2153, which is lower than the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's score of 7702. This makes the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher TDP of 100W compared to the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
The AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
The AMD FirePro A320 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
