Comparison between AMD Athlon II X4 557 and Intel Celeron 1019Y
AMD Athlon II X4 557 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron 1019Y's 1.0 GHz.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a higher turbo speed of 3.7 GHz compared to Intel Celeron 1019Y's GHz.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron 1019Y's 2 cores.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron 1019Y's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 uses the AM3 socket, while Intel Celeron 1019Y uses the FCBGA1023 socket.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 was launched in Q3 2021, while Intel Celeron 1019Y was launched in Q2 2014.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a larger L3 cache of 6 MB compared to Intel Celeron 1019Y's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon II X4 557 and Intel Celeron 1019Y are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the Intel Celeron 1019Y runs at 1.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 supports a turbo speed of 3.7 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron 1019Y.
Cores: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron 1019Y has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 supports 4 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron 1019Y.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 uses the AM3, while the Intel Celeron 1019Y uses the FCBGA1023.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 was launched on Q3 2021, while the Intel Celeron 1019Y was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has 6 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron 1019Y.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon II X4 557
Intel Celeron 1019Y
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.2 GHz
1.0 GHz
Turbo
3.7 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM3
FCBGA1023
Launched
Q3 2021
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
6 MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon II X4 557:
22%
Intel Celeron 1019Y:
8%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon II X4 557
3%
Intel Celeron 1019Y:
0%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon II X4 557: 160 watts
40%
Intel Celeron 1019Y: 10 watts
2.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon II X4 557 : Q3 2021 ✅
Intel Celeron 1019Y : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon II X4 557
Intel Celeron 1019Y
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon II X4 557 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 was launched more recently (Q3 2021) compared to the Intel Celeron 1019Y (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron 1019Y's 1.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron 1019Y's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1345, the AMD Athlon II X4 557 outperforms the Intel Celeron 1019Y (score: 521). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 features a larger L3 cache of 6MB compared to the Intel Celeron 1019Y's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a higher TDP of 160W compared to the Intel Celeron 1019Y's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron 1019Y – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron 1019Y has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 557's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron 1019Y has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 557's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron 1019Y scores 576, which is lower than the AMD Athlon II X4 557's score of 2567. This makes the AMD Athlon II X4 557 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Athlon II X4 557
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron 1019Y
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon II X4 557
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron 1019Y
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon II X4 557
The AMD Athlon II X4 557 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron 1019Y
The Intel Celeron 1019Y is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
