AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core vs Intel Pentium G3260
Table of Contents
Overview:
Comparison between AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core and Intel Pentium G3260
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Pentium G3260 is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Pentium G3260 has a higher base speed of 3.3 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has more cores (4) compared to Intel Pentium G3260's 2 cores.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Pentium G3260's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1 socket, while Intel Pentium G3260 uses the LGA1150 socket.
Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q2 2015.
Intel Pentium G3260 has a larger L3 cache of 3 MB compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core and Intel Pentium G3260 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has a base speed of 2.7 GHz, while the Intel Pentium G3260 runs at 3.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Pentium G3260.
Cores: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has 4 cores, while the Intel Pentium G3260 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core supports 4 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Pentium G3260.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1, while the Intel Pentium G3260 uses the LGA1150.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched on Q2 2015, while the Intel Pentium G3260 was released on Q2 2015.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Pentium G3260.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Intel Pentium G3260
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
2.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM1
LGA1150
Launched
Q2 2015
Q2 2015
L3 Cache
MB
3 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
19%
Intel Pentium G3260:
31%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
3%
Intel Pentium G3260:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Pentium G3260: 53 watts
13.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core : Q2 2015 ✅
Intel Pentium G3260 : Q2 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Intel Pentium G3260
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has a higher CPU Mark score of 35.79 compared to the Intel Pentium G3260's 34.98. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Pentium G3260's 53W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Pentium G3260 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Pentium G3260 has a higher base clock speed of 3.3 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1870, the Intel Pentium G3260 outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core (score: 1163). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Pentium G3260 features a larger L3 cache of 3MB compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Pentium G3260 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Pentium G3260 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Pentium G3260 scores 2096, which is lower than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's score of 2250. This makes the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Pentium G3260
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Pentium G3260
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Pentium G3260
The Intel Pentium G3260 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
