Comparison between AMD Athlon PRO 200GE and AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.2 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher turbo speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has more cores (6) compared to AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 supports more threads (12) compared to AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Both CPUs use the same socket type: AM4.
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE was launched in Q2 2018, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 was launched in Q1 2017.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE and AMD Ryzen 5 1600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 runs at 3.2 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.6 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.
Cores: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE supports 4 threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE uses the AM4, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE was launched on Q2 2018, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.6 GHz
Cores
2
6
Threads
4
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM4
Launched
Q2 2018
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE:
28%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600:
34%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
5%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600:
17%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE : Q2 2018 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE was launched more recently (Q2 2018) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's 204.67. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE scores 3693, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's score of 12278. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2066, the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE (score: 1736). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
