Comparison between AMD Athlon PRO 300GE and AMD FX-4320
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Athlon PRO 300GE's 3.4 GHz.
AMD FX-4320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon PRO 300GE's GHz.
AMD FX-4320 has more cores (4) compared to AMD Athlon PRO 300GE's 2 cores.
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket.
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon PRO 300GE and AMD FX-4320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon PRO 300GE has a base speed of 3.4 GHz, while the AMD FX-4320 runs at 4.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon PRO 300GE supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-4320.
Cores: The AMD Athlon PRO 300GE has 2 cores, while the AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon PRO 300GE supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-4320.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon PRO 300GE uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon PRO 300GE was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD FX-4320 was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon PRO 300GE has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD FX-4320.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
AMD FX-4320
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.4 GHz
4.0 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM3+
Launched
Q4 2019
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE:
31%
AMD FX-4320:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
6%
AMD FX-4320:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE : Q4 2019 ✅
AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
AMD FX-4320
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon PRO 300GE was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1911, the AMD Athlon PRO 300GE outperforms the AMD FX-4320 (score: 1564). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon PRO 300GE has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-4320's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon PRO 300GE's 3.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon PRO 300GE's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon PRO 300GE's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4320 scores 3150, which is lower than the AMD Athlon PRO 300GE's score of 4308. This makes the AMD Athlon PRO 300GE a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Athlon PRO 300GE's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
The AMD Athlon PRO 300GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-4320
The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
