Comparison between AMD Athlon X2 450 and AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X2 450's 3.5 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X2 450's 3.9 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has more cores (4) compared to AMD Athlon X2 450's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G supports more threads (8) compared to AMD Athlon X2 450's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon X2 450 uses the FM2+ socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 3400G uses the AM4 socket.
AMD Athlon X2 450 was launched in Q3 2022, while AMD Ryzen 5 3400G was launched in Q3 2019.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD Athlon X2 450's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon X2 450 and AMD Ryzen 5 3400G are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon X2 450 has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X2 450 supports a turbo speed of 3.9 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G.
Cores: The AMD Athlon X2 450 has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon X2 450 supports threads, compared to 8 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon X2 450 uses the FM2+, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X2 450 was launched on Q3 2022, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G was released on Q3 2019.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X2 450 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon X2 450
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
AM4
Launched
Q3 2022
Q3 2019
L3 Cache
MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X2 450:
14%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G:
38%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X2 450
1%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G:
13%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon X2 450: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon X2 450 : Q3 2022 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G : Q3 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon X2 450
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon X2 450 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X2 450 was launched more recently (Q3 2022) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G (Q3 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X2 450 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G's 66.74. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon X2 450 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X2 450 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X2 450 scores 1295, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G's score of 9244. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X2 450's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X2 450's 3.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2329, the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the AMD Athlon X2 450 (score: 878). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD Athlon X2 450's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
Productivity
AMD Athlon X2 450
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon X2 450
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon X2 450
The AMD Athlon X2 450 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
