🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-Athlon-X4-530-vs-AMD-FX-4320

AMD Athlon X4 530 vs AMD FX-4320

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 530 and AMD FX-4320

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 530's 2.0 GHz. AMD FX-4320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 530's GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). AMD Athlon X4 530 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Athlon X4 530 uses the AM1 socket, while AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket. AMD Athlon X4 530 was launched in Q1 2021, while AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016. AMD FX-4320 has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 530's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Athlon X4 530 and AMD FX-4320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the AMD FX-4320 runs at 4.0 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 530 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-4320.
  • Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has 4 cores, while the AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 530 supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-4320.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 530 uses the AM1, while the AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 530 was launched on Q1 2021, while the AMD FX-4320 was released on Q1 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD FX-4320.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Athlon X4 530 AMD FX-4320
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 2.0 GHz 4.0 GHz
Turbo GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM1 AM3+
Launched Q1 2021 Q1 2016
L3 Cache MB 4 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Athlon X4 530:



11%
AMD FX-4320:
26%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Athlon X4 530



2%
AMD FX-4320:
4%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Athlon X4 530: 25 watts



6.25%
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Athlon X4 530 : Q1 2021 ✅

AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Athlon X4 530



AMD FX-4320


Pro's and Con's

AMD Athlon X4 530 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 530 was launched more recently (Q1 2021) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 530 scores 1786, which is lower than the AMD FX-4320's score of 3150. This makes the AMD FX-4320 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 530's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 530's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1564, the AMD FX-4320 outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 530 (score: 690). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4320 features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 530's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 530's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Athlon X4 530's 25W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD Athlon X4 530
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Athlon X4 530
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Athlon X4 530

The AMD Athlon X4 530 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD FX-4320

The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.