Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 530 and AMD PRO A12-9800
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 530's 2.0 GHz.
AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 530's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Athlon X4 530 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD PRO A12-9800's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon X4 530 uses the AM1 socket, while AMD PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket.
AMD Athlon X4 530 was launched in Q1 2021, while AMD PRO A12-9800 was launched in Q1 2017.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon X4 530 and AMD PRO A12-9800 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the AMD PRO A12-9800 runs at 3.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 530 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD PRO A12-9800.
Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has 4 cores, while the AMD PRO A12-9800 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 530 supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD PRO A12-9800.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 530 uses the AM1, while the AMD PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 530 was launched on Q1 2021, while the AMD PRO A12-9800 was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD PRO A12-9800.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon X4 530
AMD PRO A12-9800
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
2.0 GHz
3.8 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM1
AM4
Launched
Q1 2021
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 530:
11%
AMD PRO A12-9800:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 530
2%
AMD PRO A12-9800:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon X4 530: 25 watts
6.25%
AMD PRO A12-9800: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon X4 530 : Q1 2021 ✅
AMD PRO A12-9800 : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon X4 530
AMD PRO A12-9800
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon X4 530 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 530 was launched more recently (Q1 2021) compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800's 21.92. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 530 scores 1786, which is lower than the AMD PRO A12-9800's score of 3705. This makes the AMD PRO A12-9800 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD PRO A12-9800 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 530's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 530's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1686, the AMD PRO A12-9800 outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 530 (score: 690). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 530's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Athlon X4 530's 25W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon X4 530
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD PRO A12-9800
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon X4 530
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD PRO A12-9800
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon X4 530
The AMD Athlon X4 530 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD PRO A12-9800
The AMD PRO A12-9800 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
