🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-Athlon-X4-530-vs-Intel-Celeron-J3160

AMD Athlon X4 530 vs Intel Celeron J3160

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 530 and Intel Celeron J3160

AMD Athlon X4 530 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J3160 is manufactured by Intel. AMD Athlon X4 530 has a higher base speed of 2.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3160's 1.6 GHz. Intel Celeron J3160 has a higher turbo speed of 2.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 530's GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Athlon X4 530 uses the AM1 socket, while Intel Celeron J3160 uses the BGA1170 socket. AMD Athlon X4 530 was launched in Q1 2021, while Intel Celeron J3160 was launched in Q2 2016. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Athlon X4 530 and Intel Celeron J3160 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J3160 runs at 1.6 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 530 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 2.2 GHz for the Intel Celeron J3160.
  • Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron J3160 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 530 supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Celeron J3160.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 530 uses the AM1, while the Intel Celeron J3160 uses the BGA1170.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 530 was launched on Q1 2021, while the Intel Celeron J3160 was released on Q2 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J3160.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Athlon X4 530 Intel Celeron J3160
AMD Intel
Manufacturer AMD Intel
Speed 2.0 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads 4 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM1 BGA1170
Launched Q1 2021 Q2 2016
L3 Cache MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Athlon X4 530:



11%
Intel Celeron J3160:
10%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Athlon X4 530



2%
Intel Celeron J3160:
1%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Athlon X4 530: 25 watts



6.25%
Intel Celeron J3160: 6 watts
1.5%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Athlon X4 530 : Q1 2021 ✅

Intel Celeron J3160 : Q2 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Athlon X4 530



Intel Celeron J3160


Pro's and Con's

AMD Athlon X4 530 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has a higher base clock speed of 2.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 1.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 690, the AMD Athlon X4 530 outperforms the Intel Celeron J3160 (score: 605). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has a higher TDP of 25W compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 6W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Celeron J3160 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The Intel Celeron J3160 was launched more recently (Q2 2016) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 530 (Q1 2021). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron J3160 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 530's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J3160 scores 1271, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 530's score of 1786. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 530 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


AMD Athlon X4 530
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron J3160
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Athlon X4 530
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron J3160
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Athlon X4 530

The AMD Athlon X4 530 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Celeron J3160

The Intel Celeron J3160 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.