AMD Athlon X4 730 vs AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060
Table of Contents
Overview:
Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 730 and AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon X4 730 has a higher base speed of 2.8 GHz compared to AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060's GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 730 has a higher turbo speed of 3.2 GHz compared to AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060's GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 730 has more cores (4) compared to AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060's 2 cores.
AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD Athlon X4 730's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon X4 730 uses the FM2 socket, while AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 uses the socket.
AMD Athlon X4 730 was launched in Q1 2022, while AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 was launched in Q3 2016.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon X4 730 and AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 730 has a base speed of 2.8 GHz, while the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 runs at GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 730 supports a turbo speed of 3.2 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060.
Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 730 has 4 cores, while the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 730 supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 730 uses the FM2, while the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 uses the .
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 730 was launched on Q1 2022, while the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 was released on Q3 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 730 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon X4 730
AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
2.8 GHz
GHz
Turbo
3.2 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2
Launched
Q1 2022
Q3 2016
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 730:
15%
AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060:
17%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 730
3%
AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon X4 730: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060: watts
0%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon X4 730 : Q1 2022 ✅
AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 : Q3 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon X4 730
AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon X4 730 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 730 has a higher base clock speed of 2.8 GHz compared to the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 730 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 730 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 730 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 was launched more recently (Q3 2016) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 730 (Q1 2022). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1053, the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 730 (score: 937). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 730's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 scores 1566, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 730's score of 2278. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 730 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Athlon X4 730
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon X4 730
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon X4 730
The AMD Athlon X4 730 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060
The AMD Phenom X2 Dual-Core GE-5060 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
