Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 830 and AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher base speed of 3.4 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 830's 3.0 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 830 has a higher turbo speed of 34.0 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 2600's 3.9 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has more cores (6) compared to AMD Athlon X4 830's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 supports more threads (12) compared to AMD Athlon X4 830's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon X4 830 uses the FM2+ socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 uses the AM4 socket.
AMD Athlon X4 830 was launched in Q1 2018, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 was launched in Q2 2018.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 830's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon X4 830 and AMD Ryzen 5 2600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 runs at 3.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 830 supports a turbo speed of 34.0 GHz, compared to 3.9 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600.
Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has 4 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 830 supports threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 830 uses the FM2+, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 830 was launched on Q1 2018, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 was released on Q2 2018.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon X4 830
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.0 GHz
3.4 GHz
Turbo
34.0 GHz
3.9 GHz
Cores
4
6
Threads
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
AM4
Launched
Q1 2018
Q2 2018
L3 Cache
MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 830:
21%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600:
37%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 830
4%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600:
19%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon X4 830: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon X4 830 : Q1 2018 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 : Q2 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon X4 830
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon X4 830 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 830 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 34.0 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600's 3.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 830 scores 2901, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600's score of 13188. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 was launched more recently (Q2 2018) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830 (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's 3.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2244, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 830 (score: 1292). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher CPU Mark score of 264.39 compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's 14.34. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
Productivity
AMD Athlon X4 830
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon X4 830
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon X4 830
The AMD Athlon X4 830 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
