Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 830 and Intel Core i3-3250T
AMD Athlon X4 830 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-3250T is manufactured by Intel.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.0 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 830 has a higher turbo speed of 34.0 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 830 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 2 cores.
Intel Core i3-3250T supports more threads (4) compared to AMD Athlon X4 830's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon X4 830 uses the FM2+ socket, while Intel Core i3-3250T uses the FCLGA1155 socket.
AMD Athlon X4 830 was launched in Q1 2018, while Intel Core i3-3250T was launched in Q1 2016.
Intel Core i3-3250T has a larger L3 cache of 3 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 830's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon X4 830 and Intel Core i3-3250T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-3250T runs at 3.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 830 supports a turbo speed of 34.0 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i3-3250T has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 830 supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 830 uses the FM2+, while the Intel Core i3-3250T uses the FCLGA1155.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 830 was launched on Q1 2018, while the Intel Core i3-3250T was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon X4 830
Intel Core i3-3250T
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.0 GHz
3.0 GHz
Turbo
34.0 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
FCLGA1155
Launched
Q1 2018
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
MB
3 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 830:
21%
Intel Core i3-3250T:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 830
4%
Intel Core i3-3250T:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon X4 830: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Core i3-3250T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon X4 830 : Q1 2018 ✅
Intel Core i3-3250T : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon X4 830
Intel Core i3-3250T
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon X4 830 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 830 was launched more recently (Q1 2018) compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 830 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 34.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-3250T's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i3-3250T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1684, the Intel Core i3-3250T outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 830 (score: 1292). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-3250T features a larger L3 cache of 3MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-3250T has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's 14.34. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-3250T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 830's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-3250T scores 2650, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 830's score of 2901. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 830 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Athlon X4 830
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-3250T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon X4 830
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-3250T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon X4 830
The AMD Athlon X4 830 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-3250T
The Intel Core i3-3250T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
