Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 870K and AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon X4 870K has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's 3.2 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 870K has a higher turbo speed of 4.1 GHz compared to AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's 4.0 GHz.
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core has more cores (8) compared to AMD Athlon X4 870K's 4 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon X4 870K uses the FM2+ socket, while AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core uses the AM3+ socket.
AMD Athlon X4 870K was launched in Q1 2016, while AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core was launched in Q4 2014.
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 870K's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon X4 870K and AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 870K has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core runs at 3.2 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 870K supports a turbo speed of 4.1 GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core.
Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 870K has 4 cores, while the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core has 8 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 870K supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 870K uses the FM2+, while the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core uses the AM3+.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 870K was launched on Q1 2016, while the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core was released on Q4 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 870K has MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon X4 870K
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Turbo
4.1 GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
4
8
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
AM3+
Launched
Q1 2016
Q4 2014
L3 Cache
MB
8 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 870K:
25%
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core:
23%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 870K
4%
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core:
7%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon X4 870K: 95 watts
23.75%
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon X4 870K : Q1 2016 ✅
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core : Q4 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon X4 870K
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon X4 870K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 870K has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's 3.2 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 870K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's 4.0 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1558, the AMD Athlon X4 870K outperforms the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core (score: 1435). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X4 870K has a higher CPU Mark score of 99.70 compared to the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's 54.91. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 870K has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 870K scores 3410, which is lower than the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's score of 5107. This makes the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core was launched more recently (Q4 2014) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 870K (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 870K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
Productivity
AMD Athlon X4 870K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon X4 870K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon X4 870K
The AMD Athlon X4 870K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
The AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
