Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 880K and AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 4.0 GHz.
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core has a higher turbo speed of 4.3 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's 4.2 GHz.
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core has more cores (8) compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's 4 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+ socket, while AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core uses the AM3+ socket.
AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched in Q2 2016, while AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core was launched in Q3 2014.
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon X4 880K and AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a base speed of 4.0 GHz, while the AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core runs at 4.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 880K supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to 4.3 GHz for the AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core.
Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has 4 cores, while the AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core has 8 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 880K supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+, while the AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core uses the AM3+.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched on Q2 2016, while the AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core was released on Q3 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon X4 880K
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
4.0 GHz
4.0 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Cores
4
8
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
AM3+
Launched
Q2 2016
Q3 2014
L3 Cache
MB
8 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
27%
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core:
27%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 880K
5%
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core:
8%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon X4 880K: 95 watts
23.75%
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core: 125 watts
31.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon X4 880K : Q2 2016 ✅
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core : Q3 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon X4 880K
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon X4 880K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1633, the AMD Athlon X4 880K outperforms the AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core (score: 1623). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher CPU Mark score of 38.71 compared to the AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core's 36.33. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 880K scores 3663, which is lower than the AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core's score of 6167. This makes the AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core was launched more recently (Q3 2014) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 4.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 95W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon X4 880K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon X4 880K
The AMD Athlon X4 880K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core
The AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
